Top Site Announcement Alert

California Preparers: 20 Hour Continuing Education Deadline – October 31st

Tax News

by 

Cristina Miranda
Consumer Education Specialist, FTC
 

Some current and former T-Mobile customers are about to get their money back.

As part of a $90 million dollar proposed settlement, T-Mobile is refunding customers who were unfairly billed third-party charges by the company.

According to the FTC, T-Mobile charged customers not only for regular phone services, but also for content provided by other companies. Some charges from other companies were sneaked on to customer’s monthly bills, and included charges for monthly subscriptions for ringtones, wallpaper, horoscope texts, flirting tips, and celebrity gossip that consumers never knew about, or agreed to pay for.

T-Mobile has been contacting all of its current and former crammed customers to let them know about the refund program and claims process. Customers can get more information about T-Mobile’s refund program at www.t-mobilerefund.com.

Your best defense against paying phone charges you never knew about or said yes to? Read your mobile phone bill each month – line by line, and page by page. It can save you lots of money. And if you suspect you’ve been crammed, contact your phone carrier about the charges, and file a complaint online with the FTC.

 

from www.ed.gov/blog

 

TAFPAF1.jpg

Teaching Ambassador Fellows gathered at the Teaching and Learning conference for the announcement of the Teach to Lead initiative earlier this year. (Photo credit: U.S. Department of Education)

 

The Ambassador Fellows have directly contributed to hundreds of activities at the Department and captured the voices of thousands of teachers and principals from every state. They were particularly instrumental in the RESPECT project and in inspiring and executing the Department’s current Teach to Lead initiative. They were also critical partners in offering flexibility around tying teacher evaluations to new assessments and addressing a culture of over-testing.

There are two different options for candidates. The Washington Fellowship is a full-time appointment, based at the Department’s Headquarters in Washington. The Classroom Fellowship, on the other hand, enables teachers and principals to participate on a part-time basis, while still allowing them to fulfill their regular school responsibilities.

All Teaching Ambassador Fellows spend one year learning about key federal programs and policies, sharing their expertise with federal staff members, and providing background on federal initiatives to other educators. This helps teachers better understand and implement these efforts at the federal, state and local levels. For the Fellows, the program provides greater knowledge of federal educational policy, strengthens their leadership skills, and gives them the firsthand opportunity to address some of the  challenging issues facing education today.

“Being a Teaching Ambassador Fellow has been the best professional learning of my career,” says Tami Fitzgerald. “I have learned about educational policy, but more than that, I have discovered that my voice can be heard, and our collective voices can make a difference.”  Principal Ambassador Fellow, Rachel Skerritt adds, “The Principal Ambassador Fellowship is intended to be a beneficial resource to the Department, allowing ED to hear valuable input from school leaders. However, the experience has been just as beneficial to my own learning and leadership. I constantly bring back best practices to my own school, having had the privilege of meeting passionate principals nationwide.”

Great teachers and principals—please consider applying and sharing this information with your colleagues! Sign up for updates on the Teaching and Principal application processes, call 1-800-USA-Learn, or email us at TeacherFellowship@ed.gov orPrincipalFellowship@ed.gov with questions.

Gillian Cohen-Boyer is Director of the Principal and Teaching Ambassador Fellowships Programs at the U.S. Department of Education.

from Forbes.com

There's no reason to pay more tax than is legally required, but there’s also no reason to make yourself a target for an Internal Revenue Service audit or to get your return flagged by the IRS' computers, which match billions of documents each year. So consider what situations might make you more likely to invite government scrutiny at tax time.

Be super wealthy.

This may seem like a "duh" moment. But the IRS finally is increasing the percentage of really rich people it audits, on the reasonable theory there's a lot more potential to uncover big dollars owed. It even has special "wealth squads" looking at all their holdings.

Hide offshore accounts.

It's not illegal for U.S. taxpayers to have accounts in Switzerland or Hong Kong or some Caribbean island. It's only illegal not to declare them or their income. Ask the ex-clients (some now convicts) of Swiss banking giant UBS.

Be a tax protestor.

Let's be blunt. The IRS simply does not like it when you claim you owe no taxes because the income tax is illegal or only applies to weird income categories that don't apply to you. Such wacky theories landed actor Wesley Snipes in jail.

Claim huge charitable contributions.

Rules require complete before-you-file documentation of your gifts to nonprofits. The IRS' use of correspondence audits, in which it demands you mail in the documents backing various deductions, makes claims of substantial contributions a tempting target.

Omit some reported income.

IRS computers are very good at matching all the little pieces of paper you get reporting your income with what you put on your 1040. These papers include employer W-2s and independent contractor, brokerage and bank 1099s.

Take a big home-based business loss every year.

The IRS presumes that a Schedule C business losing money three years out of five is not necessarily all that legitimate. You might have to produce evidence of a profit motive.

Claim a loss on a hobby.

By definition, a hobby is not pursued for profit. But that doesn't stop some taxpayers from trying to write off expenses for their dog showing, comic book trading or other “business."

 Use a sleazy tax preparer.

The IRS' efforts to regulate all paid tax preparers were just shot down by a federal judge. But that doesn’t stop its ongoing campaign to ferret out and shut down the sleazy ones. When the feds get onto a tax pro playing fast and loose, his or her clients become easy target

Write off big unreimbursed employee business expenses.

They're only deductible beyond 2% of adjusted gross income. The IRS may use a by-mail audit to ask for back-up paperwork, thinking you are trying to write off ordinary work clothes, commuting costs and other not-allowed items.

Take deductions in round numbers.

The world is an uneven place. So if you file a tax return taking deductions ending in lots of zeros, the IRS might think you don't have the required paper backup. You risk an audit by mail.

Make math errors.

IRS computers are programmed to check your math. Returns with errors can invite scrutiny that might trigger more IRS requests for back-up information.

Brag a lot.

Laws require the IRS to pay minimum rewards for tips in cases that result in big collections. The neighbor overhearing your expansive claims may become a government informant.

Anger an ex-business partner, employee or spouse.

They might blow the whistle on you too. And it's possible they won't do it just for the informant's bounty.

Make careless mistakes.

These can include not signing a return, leaving off your Social Security number or miswriting it. All are red flags.

Fail to file on time or at all.

The IRS has a special program that will generate a substitute return using W-2 and 1099 paperwork. Don't expect it to allow your deductions.

 

 

 

 

by 

Aditi Jhaveri
Consumer Education Specialist, FTC
 

Expecting packages shipped to your home this holiday season? You’re not the only one… scammers are, too.

We’ve learned of a phony “delivery failure notification” email making the rounds. It looks like it’s from the U.S. Postal Service — but it’s not. The email says you missed a delivery. But, it says, if you print the attached form and take it to your local post office, you can pick up your package and avoid penalties. The message might also include a link for more details.

Here’s the truth: the email is bogus and there is no package. And if you download the attachment or click on a link, you’re likely to end up with a virus or malware on your device.

 

Con artists often use the names and logos of familiar organizations to get under your guard. So how do you tell what’s legit and what’s a scam? Here are some ways to spot a bogus email:

  • It tells you to click on a link or download an attachment
  • It urges you to take immediate action
  • It asks you to “re-confirm” personal or financial information

Another sure sign an email is a scam? If you hover over the link in the email, it won’t show the official website of the supposed sender — in this case, the U.S. Postal Service website.

For more tips, check out our articles on phishing and malware. And if you have questions about a delivery by the U.S. Postal Service, visitusps.com or call 1-800-ASK-USPS.

 

BY mICHEAL COHN

The Internal Revenue Service used its legislative authority to hire employees at salaries higher than those typically given to senior executives in the federal government, according to a new government report that found the practice appropriate, even though Congress has now stepped in to change it. The report, from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, noted that the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 authorized the IRS to hire up to 40 individuals (at any one time) into positions it deemed to require extremely high-level expertise in an administrative, technical, or professional field that is critical to the IRS's success. The appointments were limited to four years. Employees hired under the Streamlined Critical Pay, or SCP, program received base salaries ranging from $130,000 to $227,300. The base pay for members of the Senior Executive Service in 2010-2013 ranged from $177,000 to $179,700.

The IRS used its streamlined critical pay authority to fill 168 critical pay positions between 1998 and 2013, when the program expired, TIGTA found. Over half were information technology positions and the remaining positions were distributed among the other nine IRS functions. Approximately 39 (38 percent) of the critical pay appointees were retained and held different appointments after their initial appointment or assigned project ended.

TIGTA's review found that the critical pay positions were adequately justified. The report said the need to recruit or retain exceptionally well-qualified individuals was demonstrated and that pay limitations were adhered to by the IRS. In November 2009, the Treasury Secretary's critical pay approval authority was delegated to the IRS commissioner, effectively eliminating an important oversight control written into the original authority.

TIGTA found that two critical pay appointees had previously worked for the IRS. After they separated from the IRS, they held private sector jobs for several years before returning to fill the critical pay positions to which they were appointed.

TIGTA did not make any recommendations in its report.

The report comes after a decision last month by IRS commissioner John Koskinen to award bonuses of around 1 percent of base salary to IRS employees. That decision came under sharp attack from some members of Congress.

On Thursday, Koskinen pointed to the results of the TIGTA report. “The IRS is pleased that the Inspector General’s review and report on the agency’s use of its Streamlined Critical Pay authority found that the IRS had ‘appropriately used its legislative authority’ and that the ‘critical pay positions were adequately justified; the need to recruit or retain exceptionally well-qualified individuals was demonstrated; and that pay limitations were adhered to,’” Koskinen said in a statement. “Over the past year, I have strongly urged the Congress to reinstate this critical program. Therefore, we are deeply disappointed that Congress has decided not to reauthorize this program, which was an important reform in the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998.

"The IRS has found that the Streamlined Critical Pay authority has been an enormously cost-effective and necessary tool in recruiting top-tier talent," Koskinen added. "Its renewal is essential to continuing IRS technology modernization progress and advances in other high-demand areas requiring people with specialized skill sets. This authority will allow the IRS to attract private-sector executives for Information Technology programs as well as other specialized functions requiring cutting edge skills and specialized expertise. The Streamlined Critical Pay program has been a huge success over the past decade, giving the IRS access to highly qualified people who have helped usher in a period of remarkable IT advances vital to running a modern tax system.

"I encourage the 114th Congress to reinstate Streamlined Critical Pay authority to ensure the tax system has the necessary level of talent required for efficient and effective tax administration," said Koskinen. "Without Streamlined Critical Pay authority, the IRS’s ability to attract top talent and deliver vital tax functions will be hampered during a period of rapid change both in technology as well as in tax administration overall.

 

Article From Accounting Today

WSJ.jpg

Uncertainty over federal tax policies is frustrating for small businesses such as Al Talbot’s construction-supply firm in California. PRESTON GANNAWAY FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

 

Many Call on Congress to Make the $500,000 Expensing Limit Permanent